To download any of the previous reports in the Hollywood Diversity Report series, click HERE.
To learn more about the UCLA Entertainment and Media Research Initiative, click HERE.
UCLA Hollywood Diversity Report 2025, Part 2: StreamingDownload the Full Report HERE
UCLA earns third place in National College Fed Challenge
The competition encourages undergraduate students to learn about the U.S. economy, monetary policymaking and the role of the Federal Reserve System
Ali Haider Ismail (Advisor), Blake Balak (Student), Terrence Yu (Student), Michael Barr (Federal Reserve Governor), Jiya Barman (Student), Valentina Alencar Barros (Student), Loretta Lye (Student), Chris Surro (Primary Advisor) / Photo: Federal Reserve
Citlalli Chávez-Nava
UCLA secured third place in the prestigious National College Fed Challenge, an annual team competition that invites undergraduate students to learn about the U.S. economy and monetary policymaking, simulating the work of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). The finals were held in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 21.
This year’s UCLA team included five student presenters chosen from a group of 25 students enrolled in a spring quarter course that prepares students for the fall competition. During the first round of the challenge, the UCLA team recorded a video outlining their federal policy proposal, opting to hold interest rates steady, a decision which differed from both the Federal Reserve (the central bank of the United States) and many other university teams who proposed cutting interest rates.
“This difference reflected the students’ analysis that dealing with inflation was still a pressing concern even as the labor market began to weaken,” said Chris Surro ‘20, assistant adjunct professor of economics at UCLA and the team’s head coach.
After the video submission, UCLA’s team moved on to the semifinal round, which consisted of a remote question and answer sessions with judges from the Federal Reserve system and eventually to the final round in Washington D.C., where students had to perform their presentation in person followed by live questions from judges.
“Our UCLA team had great teamwork and chemistry. They were extremely well prepared and showcased tremendous poise throughout the competition,” said Surro. “During our preparation, we emphasized ‘sounding like an economist,’ using the jargon and language that economists use, the students accomplished this extremely well.”
Back row: Chris Surro (Primary Advisor), Loretta Lye (Student), Valentina Alencar Barros (Student), Terrence Yu (Student), Blake Balak (Student), Ali Haider Ismail (Advisor) Front row: Francisco Vazquez-Grande (Judge), Karen Pence (Judge), Jiya Barman (Student holding the trophy in the middle front), Thomas Lubik (Judge), Matthew Luecke (Judge)/ Photo: Federal Reserve
Surro said UCLA’s team also relied on other classmates who worked behind the scenes, helping with research, making slides and graphs and writing scripts. Student teams were evaluated on their economic analysis, responses to the judges’ questions, teamwork and presentations.
Surro has advised the team since UCLA entered the competition in 2021. Initially, participation in the Fed Challenge was an unstructured, informal effort. Today, under Surro’s guidance, students prepare for the challenge through a dedicated course and collaborate closely with faculty and peers.
Third-year economics major Terrence Yu, one of this year’s UCLA team members, reflected on his recent experience.
“The most memorable part of the Fed Challenge was stepping inside the Federal Reserve building, where our team met Fed Governor Michael Barr,” he said. “Presenting our monetary policy recommendation in the actual FOMC boardroom to Federal Reserve economists, alongside my teammates, was truly a surreal and unforgettable experience.”
Yu said participating in the competition provided him with invaluable insights into economic policymaking.
“Before the Fed Challenge, I viewed monetary policy as fairly black-and-white, but stepping into the shoes of the FOMC showed me how nuanced and complex policymaking truly is. In an environment like today, every decision requires rigorous analysis of competing data, careful judgment under uncertainty and an awareness that every choice will be scrutinized,” he added.
The College Fed Challenge organizers praised the UCLA team for being so competitive despite this being only their fifth year in the program. Earlier this fall, UCLA’s Fed Challenge team won their division title, which earned them a spot in the finals.
In total, UCLA’s team has won four division titles and has earned two third place finishes during the final competition. This year’s College Fed Challenge included 139 schools from 36 states across the nation. Pace University earned first place, and Harvard College placed second.
“I thank these students for the dedication, creativity, and analytical skills they demonstrated as they grappled with real-world economic challenges,” said Federal Reserve Chair Jerome H. Powell in a statement.
Yu said he encourages sophomores and juniors interested in economic policy to apply to the class when applications open during winter quarter.
“The Fed Challenge offers a rare chance to dive deeply into both theory and real-world application while developing valuable technical and soft skills. It’s also one of the few opportunities to be part of a smaller, tight-knit economics class at UCLA and build lasting friendships.”
Student support team: Michelle Chen, Matthew Cherfane, Christian Helleberg, Anshika Khandelwal, Misha Canin, Sebastian Diaz, Kristina Gharibyan, Lily Aronovitz.
Coaches:
Head Coach: Chris Surro ’20, Adjunct Assistant Professor
Assistant Coach: Ali Haider Ismail, UCLA PhD student
UCLA’s Department of Economics also thanks their Board of Visitors members John Bucher, Terry Kramer, Albert Lee, Elizabeth Obershaw and Tracy Stuart for funding the trip.
Susan Slyomovics receives American Anthropological Association book award
Reducing financial barriers to contraception lowers rate of unintended pregnancies and abortions
The UCLA study quantifies the benefits of federal programs that fund contraception for low-income Americans
Unsplash/Marina Raspopova
Citlalli Chávez-Nava
A UCLA clinical trial finds that reducing the costs of contraception results in 16% fewer unintended pregnancies and 12% fewer abortions among low-income women after two years.
In a working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), the study offers rigorous experimental evidence that directly connects financial access to contraception for a broad population of women in the United States, helping to answer questions of long-standing academic and policy interest.
“According to our findings, eliminating financial barriers allowed women to choose more effective contraception methods and reduce undesired pregnancies and abortions,” said Martha Bailey, professor of economics and director of the California Center for Population Research, and the study’s lead author.
In the U.S., the rate of unintended pregnancy is more than five times higher among women in poverty than women with incomes at least two times the poverty level. The study suggests that the high cost of reliable contraception is an important contributor.
The findings are particularly relevant for policy discussions surrounding ongoing cuts to the Title X program, which serves millions of low-income Americans.
Removing all contraceptive costs through M-CARES study
The findings were based on the Michigan Contraceptive Access, Research, and Evaluation Study (M-CARES) which recruited low-income women at Title X medical providers between 2018-2023. During this period, randomly assigned participants were given vouchers that made any method of contraception free or sharply discounted. The goal of the M-CARES study was to remove cost barriers for all methods available at Title X providers and to follow changes in the choice of contraception and pregnancy outcomes over time.
The findings were based on the Michigan Contraceptive Access, Research, and Evaluation Study (M-CARES) which recruited low-income women who sought care through Title X, a federal program that subsidizes reproductive health and family planning services for low-income Americans, between 2018 and 2023. During this period, randomly assigned participants were given vouchers that made any method of contraception free or sharply discounted. The goal of the M-CARES study was to remove cost barriers for all methods available at Title X providers and to follow changes in the choice of contraception and pregnancy outcomes over time.
Based on data analysis over a two-year period, the study found:
A significant reduction in pregnancies and abortions. Subsidizing contraception resulted in:
A 16% reduction in pregnancies
A 12% reduction in abortions
A shift toward more effective contraceptive methods. Removing all financial barriers:
Increased the likelihood of buying contraception by 69%
Raised the efficacy of chosen methods by 44%
Raised the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), such as intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants, by 217%
“It’s important to note that the effects of the study last well beyond the availability of the subsidies. The effects of increasing affordability extend over a two-year period and likely beyond,” said Bailey.
Furthermore, unlike previous academic studies, the M-CARES survey findings include high-quality administrative micro-data offering a more comprehensive view of contraceptive use.
“Most studies have only been able to document changes in childbirth. Because we had administrative records, we were able to see changes in pregnancies and abortions, which are severely underreported in surveys,” added Bailey.
Timely findings for the 2026 Congressional budget adoption
In March of this year, the Trump Administration announced a freeze of close to $35 million in funding to Title X grantees. This freeze left California, among seven other states, without Title X funding. And there is a strong possibility this program will continue to face cuts or complete elimination for the upcoming 2026 federal fiscal year.
Bailey thinks that further disruptions to Title X grantees will be devastating for low-income women, worsening not just their health, but their social and economic outcomes as well as resources for their children.
“Generalizing our survey findings, we see that keeping Title X sliding scale costs as they stand now, results in significantly higher rates of unintended pregnancy among low-income women and causes more abortions nationally than if contraception were completely free,” said Bailey.
Instead, Bailey says the M-CARES evaluation provides evidence that federal Title X dollars help U.S. families and expanding the program would also have benefits.
“The Title X program is a cost-effective way to empower parents to choose their families according to their own desires,” she said. “Preserving Title X and expanding its generosity would strengthen the reproductive health safety net.”
How lethal aggression increased reproductive success in wild chimpanzees
UCLA’s Compassionate Conversations focuses on ‘kindness to the stranger’
UCLA’s Jessica W. Lynch named 2025 Fulbright Scholar
Lynch plans to return to Brazil to further collaborate with a network of researchers at Brazil’s National Primate Center during spring 2026.
Video: UCLA Future of History Conference
UCLA Social Sciences
UCLA’s Meyer and Renee Luskin Department of History and UCLA’s Luskin Center for History and Policy hosted the “Future of History of Conference” on Nov. 3 at UCLA’s Luskin Conference Center.
The event featured Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution Lonnie G. Bunch III and opening remarks by UCLA’s Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost Darnell Hunt.
Below are recordings from the event.
PART I: A Conversation with UCLA History Faculty
Featuring:
• Kelly Lytle Hernández, Thomas E. Lifka Endowed Chair of History Professor of UCLA Meyer and Renee Luskin Department of History
• Sanjay Subrahmanyam, Irving and Jean Stone Endowed Chair in Social Sciences Distinguished Professor, UCLA Meyer and Renee Luskin Department of History
• Vivien Tejada Assistant Professor, UCLA Meyer and Renee Luskin Department of History
Moderated by Brenda E. Stevenson Nickoll Family Endowed Chair in History and African American Studies Distinguished Professor, UCLA Meyer and Renee Luskin Department of History
PART II: A Conversation with Secretary Lonnie G. Bunch III
Featuring:
• Robin D. G. Kelley Gary B. Nash Endowed Chair in United States History Distinguished Professor, UCLA Meyer and Renee Luskin Department of History
• Athena N. Jackson, Norman and Armena Powell University Librarian, UCLA
Moderated by David N. Myers Sady and Ludwig Kahn Endowed Chair in Jewish History Director, UCLA Luskin Center for History and Policy Distinguished Professor, UCLA Meyer and Renee Luskin Department of History
‘Smarter machines, wiser humans’: The future of AI and communication
L.A. labor leaders link the past and future during visit to UCLA campus